What happens after we request an enterprise SI assessment?

You name the systems in scope, and the two-week assessment reads them with read access only. EOS makes the enterprise ready for Super Intelligence (SI): it reads the systems you already run, shows the source of every figure, and leaves each decision to an authorized person. The enterprise keeps data sovereignty and full ownership of its information and chooses the SI model provider that works over it.

What does the assessment cost?

$15,000 for two weeks, read-only. If you continue to the $50,000 pilot, the $15,000 is credited.

When do we see the first finding?

Within 14 days, from your own data.

Will EOS change anything in our systems?

No. EOS reads and does not write. Nothing is migrated, and your systems stay the systems of record.

Who should send the request?

A chief officer, or the leader who owns the systems in question, such as finance, operations, procurement or supply chain. One person who can name the systems and settle findings is enough to start.

Evidence

Provenance for blockchain data in enterprise reporting

A chain is a public record, which makes it easy to assume that any figure drawn from it is self-evidently true. It is not. The figure depends on which node answered, at which block, through which provider, with which labels applied. Provenance is the record of those four things beside the number, and without it a board report quotes a figure nobody can reproduce.

A short path through this page. Open each step to go deeper.

1The four things a chain figure needs

The source. Which chain, and which node or provider answered. Two providers can disagree about a pending transaction or a reorganized block.
The block or time. A balance without a block height is a balance at some unknown moment.
The derivation. A "treasury balance" is a sum over addresses. Which addresses, and who decided they belong to the treasury?
The label and its origin. "Exchange deposit address" is a claim made by someone on some date. The claim is only as good as the one who made it.

EOS keeps these apart on purpose. Source data is what the provider returned, as returned. Inference, scenario, decision and outcome are kept apart from all three; an SI's inference is never shown as an observation.

3Why this matters beyond audit

When two teams disagree about a number, provenance turns an argument into a comparison: same chain, different block; same block, different address set; same address set, different provider. The disagreement is kept and settled by the person with authority, and the settlement is recorded. The reconciliation method depends on it.

4What EOS records, and what it does not claim

EOS records the source, the as-of, the derivation path and the label origin for every chain figure it shows, and it produces an evidence pack an auditor can verify offline. It does not claim to be a chain-analytics vendor; it reads from the providers you configure, and every label it uses names its source.

Request the two-week assessment Book a $100 planning session