STATIC PAGE Interactive levers, live recompute, and Record decision run in the app build; every figure, formula, evidence row, and WHY below is the real render, pre-computed. Evidence panels are opened for review.
Financial Intelligence
Working capital, margin, and cash conversion as views over the same deterministic model the Command Center runs; the ties are printed, not asserted. All figures MODELED on the SYNTHETIC tenant. Read-only by architecture; flags never block.
| SKU | Avg units | Unit cost | Working capital | Formula | Evidence |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| GC-4471 | 3,767 | $41 | $155,200 | wc = avgInv 3,767 x cost 41.2 |
Evidence row
sourceSystem: SAP S/4HANA · sourceId: DET-01/MAT-4471 · field: planningParameters · value: LT 6w, MOQ 5000 · lastModifiedAt: 2026-07-18T09:12:04Z |
| MP-5120 | 7,738 | $14 | $107,558 | wc = avgInv 7,738 x cost 13.9 |
Evidence row
sourceSystem: NetSuite · sourceId: STG-02/ITEM-5120 · field: planningParameters · value: LT 3w, MOQ 12000 · lastModifiedAt: 2026-07-19T14:02:41Z |
| OF-2210 | 2,771 | $75 | $206,440 | wc = avgInv 2,771 x cost 74.5 |
Evidence row
sourceSystem: Oracle Fusion · sourceId: OSK-03/PRD-2210 · field: planningParameters · value: LT 9w, MOQ 1500 · lastModifiedAt: 2026-07-17T02:41:20Z |
| Total | $469,198 | sum of parts = health overview working capital, exactly |
| SKU | Revenue | Gross margin | % |
|---|---|---|---|
| GC-4471 | $4,950,400 | $1,951,040 | 39.4 |
| MP-5120 | $4,841,200 | $2,094,560 | 43.3 |
| OF-2210 | $3,610,880 | $1,209,000 | 33.5 |
Revenue ties to the health overview ($13,402,480); price and cost levers preview in the simulator with the full causal path.
CCC = DIO 21.0 (= 365 x WC 469,198 / COGS 8,147,880) + DSO 38 - DPO 45 = 14.0 days
DIO is the term this product moves; DSO and DPO carry their aging evidence.
total PPV = 101,920 + -79,040 + 45,136 = 68,016 USD MODELED
2 of 3 lines above standard; the line detail lives in Procurement. Same calculation, surfaced once.
OF-2210 carries 44% of working capital.
share = 206,440 / 469,198 = 44%
OF-2210 runs 33.5% against a 39.2% portfolio.
gap = 39.2 - 33.5 points
cash conversion holds at 14.0 days, inside the 60 day target; the DIO term is the lever this product moves.
CCC = DIO 21.0 (= 365 x WC 469,198 / COGS 8,147,880) + DSO 38 - DPO 45 = 14.0 days
purchase price variance nets 68,016 USD unfavorable, 2 of 3 lines above standard.
total PPV = 101,920 + -79,040 + 45,136 = 68,016 USD MODELED
Polymers index drift 2.6 percent is the largest commodity pressure on standard cost; drill to Markets for the index and the affected SKUs.
1688 late-risk units in the receiving window carry expedite exposure into landed cost; drill to Operations for the expedite arithmetic.
Forecast accuracy 97.7 percent sets the buffer stock that margin carries; drill to the Simulator for the service and delta arithmetic.
Why margin moved, answered with drivers: each row derives from a live surface and drills to its arithmetic; nothing here is asserted beside the record.
Three families, COGS, INVENTORY, ACCRUALS, 15 rule templates, each naming its sources, the variance class it catches, and the threshold above which it alerts. Rules are versioned, never edited: an amendment appends and every prior version is retained, because a rule that can be quietly rewritten is a reconciliation you cannot defend. Evaluation is deterministic and read-only; the engine flags, it never writes back.
| Rule | Family | Sources | Catches | Alert threshold |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| COGS-01 v1 | COGS | ERP material cost vs WMS receipt cost | cost-basis mismatch | $25,000.00 |
| COGS-02 v1 | COGS | ERP standard cost vs Freight accrual | landed-cost gap | $50,000.00 |
| COGS-03 v1 | COGS | ERP local cost vs Treasury rate table | fx translation drift | $20,000.00 |
| COGS-04 v1 | COGS | Supplier contract terms vs AP invoice | price leakage | $15,000.00 |
| COGS-05 v1 | COGS | Unit A ledger vs Unit B ledger | intercompany leakage | $40,000.00 |
| INV-01 v1 | INVENTORY | ERP balance vs WMS count | quantity drift | $30,000.00 |
| INV-02 v1 | INVENTORY | ERP valuation vs GL inventory account | valuation drift | $60,000.00 |
| INV-03 v1 | INVENTORY | Reserve assumption vs Aged count | reserve understatement | $45,000.00 |
| INV-04 v1 | INVENTORY | Shipment terms vs ERP receipt date | cutoff variance | $25,000.00 |
| INV-05 v1 | INVENTORY | Consignment ledger vs WMS location class | consignment misclass | $20,000.00 |
| ACC-01 v1 | ACCRUALS | ERP goods receipt vs GL accrual | accrual completeness | $35,000.00 |
| ACC-02 v1 | ACCRUALS | AP invoice date vs GL posting period | timing mismatch | $15,000.00 |
| ACC-03 v1 | ACCRUALS | GL accrual vs AP posting | double count | $25,000.00 |
| ACC-04 v1 | ACCRUALS | Contract rate card vs Accrual estimate | estimate drift | $20,000.00 |
| ACC-05 v1 | ACCRUALS | HR census vs GL bonus accrual | basis mismatch | $30,000.00 |
Worked example on SYNTHETIC history, 24 months of Material cost across record and receipt: 8 breaching months, classification SYSTEMATIC. The hidden-money read separates systematic variance, the found-money case, from timing that self-reverses; the classification method is proprietary, and its full derivation ships in your tenant's evidence drawer and reproduces under the verification harness, never on a public page.